Insolvency News and Analysis - June 20, 2014 | South Bay Law Firm
2117
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-2117,single-format-standard,bridge-core-1.0.2,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,side_area_uncovered_from_content,footer_responsive_adv,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-20.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.1,vc_responsive,elementor-default
 

Insolvency News and Analysis – June 20, 2014

Insolvency News and Analysis – June 20, 2014

Alphabetical by Author

Alphabetical by Author (Photo credit: woohoo_megoo)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bankruptcy and Insolvency News and Analysis – Week of June 16 – 20, 2014:

Confirmation:

Prevalence and Utility of Roadmap Decisions in Mega-Cases

No Confirmation Without Representation: New Test Is Proposed for Approval of a Debtor’s Proposed Slate of Post-Confirmation Officers and Directors

Bankruptcy Sales:

Bankruptcy Sale: No Stay Pending Appeal, Then No Appeal?

Secured Lending and Claims:

An L of a Mess: Perfecting Against LLP’s

Equity Begets Flexibility: Valuing a Secured Creditor’s Claim in Bankruptcy and Allocating Post-Petition Interest

Avoidance Actions:

Seventh Circuit Reads Bankruptcy Safe Harbor Broadly

Defending Preference and Claw-Back Actions in the Wake of the Supreme Court’s Bellingham Decision

Executory Contracts and Intellectual Property:

Contract Remedies in the Face of Imminent Default – What Happens to State Law Adequate Assurance and Anticipatory Breach in Bankruptcy?

Eighth Circuit reconsiders trademark licenses in bankruptcy

Cross-Border:

Comity and drama: current trends in cross-border insolvencies

Jurisdiction and Bellingham Analysis:

Supreme Court’s decision in Bellingham leaves key Stern v Marshall questions unanswered

And Still More:

No Comments

Post A Comment